Survey Frame Says: You’re Fund-a-Mentally Fired, Part 1 of 2

Two-party butthexed choices.

What if both choices are debauched and controlled per secretive recordings of private butthex in the Prism archive?

Democracy. If you think democracy means everyone gets a circumscribed vote, as in yes/no, think again. A ballot vote is framed by proposition. Who forms the propositions? Only a privileged few do. Now don’t take that too literally. Not only are there legislators and other government agents who submit and may ostensibly compose or edit the propositions of governance, there are those who create money from nothing and can out lobby anyone limited to money earned by volitional reciprocation of value.

Life is an essay, and the only way we have democracy is to have ecology, otherwise know as the free market. The Second Amendment is in the Bill of Rights to guarantee a free market of violence and ultimately of governance, if we can go by the Declaration of Independence…

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government. … But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them [i.e. the People, emphasis on Men, created equally human but obviously not equal literally, as inspirational rhetoric would suggest with hyperbolic license] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

…and if we can go by the very beginning of the U.S. Constitution…

We the People of the United States…ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.

I declare that in my judgment the U.S. Government under control of an elite and a majority of the American population are ‘pursuing invariably’ my kindly destruction one stifled day at a time, and I claim to be the rightful master with others of the U.S. Government created in my name with my authority and refuse to pledge allegiance not ultimately to myself. Since most rightful masters insist on pursuing my reduction as government, for that is what We the People of ultimate political authority must be, I have no legitimate right or might to thwart the governance we deserve on the whole; however, I declare by the Founding Fathers that I have every right to a political divorce from the stupid majority.

Our political forebears passed to me with my heritage the right to self-determine my government with the violent example of the American Revolution and the peaceful example of dissolving the ‘perpetual Union’ of the first U.S. Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, in violation of its Article XIII. The signers of the U.S. Constitution were either traitors to the United States, or they rightfully were the United States. Who the fuck are you?!

I only wish it were that no man is an island, because no micro-island is a nation. Where are my bros before hoes?

If I have a constitutional right to petition ‘the Government’ per the First Amendment, how is it I do not have the right to petition so-called fellow citizens on the sidewalk, in their housing plans, via their mailboxes? Do you my fellow Americans claim to be endowed with only the privileges of democracy without the responsibilities? Without a free market of negligible-entry-cost petitioning both political and economic, there is no social fabric, certainly no civilized fabric, and ultimately no society.

So again, the correct interpretive frame on human affairs is…


That is the nature of democracy, and morality, and so much more. Might makes right. Evolutionary might is the greatest, and it behooves mortals to respect ecology, free markets, natural selection.

It is not the nature of democracy to have centralized control of the propositions put to democratic consideration. That is a lie. The fiat money has bought the framers of our proffered propositions, and the money alchemists control the people’s democratic voice with two methods I wish to identify in this article: (1) vocabulary bias, and (2) question bias.

You can’t be a racist if you are black. You can’t be a sexist if you are female. We buy into that shit even as we attempt to engage in rational debate to the contrary. We have lost if the tacit assumptions of vocabulary are accepted, period. Reverse racism is tacitly secondary racism, and you have already lost to yourself mentally if you pedestalize propagandist ideas of racism, sexism, justice, women and their damned feelings, etc. on the high ground. Furthermore, it might occur to the astute reader that logical argumentation is pointless with inferior (uncivilized?) people, but then one would have to accept both emotionally and logically with psychological congruency that all men are not created equal, and certainly not all people are, as in the remaining women and children. That takes care of vocabulary bias.

The establishment question always is: Should [it] be required for the restitution of Progressive victim groups?

Eventually, with the ceaseless flow of wealth and services opposite to the ceaseless flow of fiat money, the only rival to white men of the NWO—essentially the better white men of the rank and file—are conquered, and the generationally incorrigible useful idiots already were. I note for the emotionally weak that men of better white culture are almost always, but not always, white of skin, and that lines of race are blurry but usefully approximate to functional social divisions. I can’t take the civilized high road alone, since civilization requires cooperation, so I must find a lowest common denominator of critical civilized mass viable to life and my constitution, if I can, which I have not, but I write. I write.

If the questions of a country’s governance are always framed with a consistent bias, the country must evolve in the direction of that bias. It is impossible for productive people without power of government or fiat money to play perfect defense. Might makes right. The winner out scores the loser by definition, and those who play only defense, those who mentally assent to the swaddling binds of the status quo deserve to lose as they deserve the government they get. Get with your people, with your patriotism, with your morality—but get with your in-group if you can. In the event of a political and economic vacuum, you will need a turnkey solution to your sovereignty problems, which will have become as manageable as they will get. That takes care of question bias.

Observe how Denying the Hitler Antecedent is used to emotionally anchor the desired herd direction for Americans by disguising the ugly truths of that direction with ugly lies from Hitler. Even a broken Hitler clock would be right twice a day.

Anti-Hitler Anchoring

Anti-Hitler anchoring to inculcate the American public.

What would happen if we honored the objective bias of the truth, of reality? What if we used vocabulary and question frames for mental freedom rather than mental bondage? You would get something akin to my survey in part two, posting soon.

—‘Reality’ Doug, 26 July 2013


About ‘Reality’ Doug

I'm feed up with herd people, so civil and uncivilized, these feckless barbarians with manicures. Where is Galt's Gulch? and where are the people to go there? Who am I? Who is John Galt?
Gallery | This entry was posted in Political Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s