Devilish Piety


The three great Abrahamic religions are: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Mormonism is a less popular distant fourth.

When viewed in terms of meme evolution, religion looks like heavily hierarchical politics with an elite governing dull masses by ceremonial domestication. Responsibility is ritualized into infallible methodology, and the leaders alone apply principles.

No where is religious submission more absolute than with the Abrahamic religions. The Abrahamic religions are revealed religions, meaning that the expectations of supernatural authority have been made manifest. All of the big three are religions of conquest: Judaism by covert tax farming, Christianity by catholic indoctrination, and Islam by relentless zealotry. No non-Abrahamic revealed religions have been a leading religion for a millennium.

Good works are not license for bad works. I readily concede many good works in the name of religion. Any effective religion must be popular and must have good works. I am necessarily evaluating Abrahamic fundamentals in theory and in practice. I am necessarily conveying the least pleasant aspects because those aspects—to the extent they really in fact are—are the most dangerous aspect, and they are readily ignored by those with a vested interest in cowardice or exploitation.

I don’t make the truth about religion or society. I am simply evaluating the evidence out of frustration for being fed lies from the religious and non-religious alike. This post is about the least flattering things I think I know about Abrahamic religions. That is the limited topic out of necessity to think and write with specificity. You are welcome to consider my arguments and to put them into context yourself. That is what a thinking person would do. This is a long post, just shy of 4,300 words. There is no need to read it all at one time, much less have an ironclad opinion about it.

Yes, I expect most of you to hate me for this post. Your hate is the measure of your doubt for which you expect everyone but yourself to change for your illusory reconciliation with life. Piss off, inflexible dumb asses. I can’t make universal truth any more than you can. The red pill like Greek Rationalism is not earnestly for everybody, only the brave. Selective use of evidence is a misuse of evidence.

You know who you are. Why not bail now if you don’t respect the autonomy of truth vis-à-vis your desires? Your personal feelings are not social facts. I know nothing but the fact of my ignorance. This is my attempt at identifying important social truths that affect you and me. My knowledge is my power, and I’m not giving it up easily. Shall we begin the examination?


Objective historians consider Moses to be less than historically verified. However, the Five Books of Moses do offer an institutional codification of culture to adhere and rule an ancient Jewish people. They were the first books of the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, written roughly 2,500 years ago. If you’re keeping score at home, that would be a few hundred years after the fall of ancient Israel completed by Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon.

Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the First Temple, built over 7 years (1 Kings 6:38) at the direction of King Solomon. For comparative purposes, Solomon’s house of unknown size took 13 years (1 Kings 7:1) to complete, and the House of the Forest of Lebanon was bigger than the Temple. Perhaps the Temple was not the most grand and opulent building around.

The ethnic superiority of the Jews vis-à-vis everyone else is their Chosenness according to the Hebrew Bible. This superiority is license to rule goyim as livestock on a tax farm. Debt slavery was codified in the Books of Moses and has been an institutional pursuit of Jews collectively at least since that time. Support of Jewish heritage undivorced from Chosenness is ultimately support of a continuous, institutional effort to enslave or domesticate all goyim.

I note without prejudice that virtually all Americans—by their explicit support of government policy by votes and tax payments, and by their exclusive use of US dollars—support imperial thuggery metastasizing in the homeland. In the long run, you are the team you support.

Relevant excerpts from the Torah (Books of Moses):

  • Jew founder Jacob/Israel ‘financially engineers’ (= legally steals) the birthright of non-Jew brother Esau.

    Source: Genesis 25.

  • Jew founder Jacob/Israel fraudulently steals his father’s blessing from Esau with help from their contemptible mother, a meddler unfit for political decision-making in the usual petty bitch archetype.

    Source: Genesis 27.

  • Esau does all the productive work and Jacob enjoys it by intellectual scheming, thereby corrupting a potential win-win relationship into a win-lose relationship, and moreover debasing the makeup in genes and memes and the resultant prosperity of their combined posterity, making humanity poorer for it.

    Source: Genesis.

  • “For the Lord, your God, has blessed you, as He spoke to you, and you will lend to many nations, but you will not borrow; and you will rule over many nations, but they will not rule over you.”

    Source: Words/Deuteronomy 15:6.

  • “The Lord will open up for you His good treasury, the heaven, to give your land its rain in its [right] time, and to bless everything you do. And you will lend many nations, but you will not [need to] borrow.

    “And the Lord will set you at the head, and not at the tail, and you will be only at the top, and you will not be at the bottom, if you obey the commandments of the Lord, your God, which I am commanding you this day, to observe to fulfill [them].”

    Source: Words/Deuteronomy 28:12-3, note the good rabbi’s interpretive insertion of the idea ‘need to’.

A passage in the Scriptures, part of the Hebrew Bible written after the Torah, confirms the debt slavery to be, dah, slavery:

“A rich man will rule over the poor, and a borrower is a slave to a lender.”

Source: Mishlei/Proverbs 22:7.

No one needs to borrow without government coercion, which is why practitioners of banking and financial engineering, whether Jewish or not, seek out government support. History indicates Jews leverage government for privileged purposes best. Their superior motive is cultural and ethnic purity.

It may be that the Jews without a Jewish state turned to tax farming to maintain their separate identity. In such a situation, there is only plenty of nasty goyim for the taking. It was apparently true during the Jewish exile to Babylon. That is the period scholars think the Torah was written and compiled, and it was the turning point by which the Torah functionally replaced the Temple. Jews were expelled from many European countries during the Middle Ages, in hindsight a prelude to European creation of modernity. A lack of cultural cohesiveness backed by Jewish social engineering would have been most impractical for the home team. And who can forget the Rothschild family that won the Mercantile Revolution still going strong today in matured derivative form?

Enters the Reform Jew, but is Judaism without license of Chosenness still Judaism or anything independently viable? And whats with the Ashkenazim? Greenspan? Bernanke?


Jesus was a Jew, a reform Jew so original and great his legacy in not even considered a form of Judaism. Lately, I have entertained the hypothesis that Jesus, on purpose or not, created a religion for dutiful Esau’s to service Judaism. The entire meme evolution from Judaism to Christianity is quite instructive. Jesus created the first (successful) Abrahamic religion of inclusiveness, evolved from the original exclusiveness.

Contrary to dutiful service to Jews if not Judaism, Jesus did improvise a scourge in Harod’s Temple to drive out the financial engineers (John 2:15), and his uncharacteristic forcefulness suggests a lesson of superlative importance. Virtually all self-proclaimed Christians ignore that lesson and dutifully live on the IMF plantation. Jerusalem and the Temple in the time of Jesus parallels Mecca and the Kaaba in the time of Mohammad, the latter history detailed infra. Use of institutional force as overwhelming advantage to control others without overwhelming merit is a common theme of history: societal corruption. Its lack is a fundamental measure of a culture’s greatness.

Before Jesus, the Abrahamic commandment to love thy neighbor was for all practical purposes exclusively for fellow Jews. The universal morality preached by Jesus opens his adherents to exploitation, a fundamental requirement of an Esau religion.

“You shall neither take revenge from nor bear a grudge against the members of your people; you shall love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.”

Source: Vayikra/Leviticus 19:18.

If you are a goy among ruling Jews in person, you will be better off in theory. The Jewish application of debt slavery is by stealth, and a little official equivocation is good for business.

“When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not taunt him. The stranger who sojourns with you shall be as a native from among you, and you shall love him as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. I am the Lord, your God.”

Source: Vayikra/Leviticus 19:33–4.

The second book of Moses is quite clear on whom is to be loved as a neighbor:

“When you lend money to My people, to the poor person [who is] with you, you shall not behave toward him as a lender; you shall not impose interest upon him.”

Source: Shemot 22:24, but Exodus 22:25 in the King James Version (KJV).

After Jesus, the term ‘neighbor’ was expanded indefinitely with the supposed virtue of being a good Samaritan (Luke 10:29–37). Communism shares the same moral obligation of the greater good with no membership criterion. At least Jews have standards. To assume a morality with everyone is to be exploitable by everyone who would deceive you. It seems that the non-Jew Samaritan helped a distressed Jew unlike the two previous passersby who were Jewish. Samaritans and Jews were at odds in Jesus’ day.

The change in the interpretation of neighbor was part of the foundational change. Perhaps most importantly, the Ten Commandments were superseded by the two primary commandments of the Gospel:

“Jesus said unto him, THOU SHALT LOVE THE LORD THEY GOD WITH ALL THY HEART, AND WITH ALL THY SOUL, AND WITH ALL THEY MIND. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THEYSELF. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”

Source: Matthew 22:37–40, KJV.

Christians, as the premier Esau, have been dutiful in their dogged support for modern Israel with their blood and treasure. That support has been cultivated by Jewish utilization of goyim government per the standard modus operandi.

Advertisement of the Hollywood movie The Ten Commandments (1956) involved the instillation of plaques and monuments across the United States of America on government properties. The plaques and monuments were all inscribed with the Decalogue. Americans, mostly Christian, were thus encouraged and conditioned to be mindful of the foundational law of Judaism by the power of their own government. Do the two commandments of the Gospel have a proper English name fitting of their foundational status? Nah. Control the vocabulary and you control the chumps.

Without boutique law for banking, investment by bankers would fail under regular contract law and liabilities would be divvied among the parties to the bad investment. As it is with government force married to banking and financial engineering, liabilities are socialized or nationalized, spread across masses who are the collateral for the so-called debt. We also have boutique law for marriage and divorce at the behest of the ruling elite. Freedom, privilege, and responsibility of the individual is the ignored solution as usual. Stop seeking institutional solutions to individual problems. Our governmental institutions should supplementally enforce free market decisions and little else.

From Matthew 19:24, we have Jesus saying, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” It’s a happy mistranslation from Aramaic resulting in ‘camel’ rather than ‘rope’. Rope can be deconstructed into its elemental threads with persistent patience. Either way, indulge in the poverty, dumb asses. No patrimony for you, Esau. lullzlullzlullz

Jesus never once condemned slavery, which fits the fact of American chattel slavery surviving best and longest in the Bible Belt. Slavery has evolved dramatically since then. It was not necessarily hard to predict.

Apostle John was presumably familiar with the Jewish practice of debt slavery. In Revelation 3:9, he wrote, “Behold, I will make [i.e. force] them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie….” Later in the text, at 13:17, we have a money alchemist’s dream: “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

Part of being a functional man is understanding the feral nature of women as a complement to lower masculinity. The lower masculinity, metaphorically below the waist, is sculpted into fine form by becoming through experiment and study what is sexually attractive to women. It is possible in the West’s zeitgeist of postfeminism/postmodernism because Western women are liberated from survival instincts to such a perverse extreme that a man can empirically refine his lower masculinity per the sexual responsiveness of women at large. Liberated and subsidized women are free to act on their perfect measuring instincts of reproduction without the compromising adjustments of survival instincts.

The tenth commandment treats a wife as the property of her husband like his house, his ox, his man-slave, and his woman-slave. Per Matthew 5:28, Jesus said, “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” It is a fact that the pussy goes where the political power is. Solomon had hundreds of wives and mistresses. Men of extreme reproductive privilege have employed wet nurses to get the most value out of their harems.

Now what an admonition here from Jesus! Human beauty is foremost that which is rated reproductively excellent by instinctual evaluation. The only other beauty left to consider is the higher beauty of intellectual elegance and survival excellence, but a builder must first be a conquerer, and conquest comes from the loins. Human instincts are hardwired and not made to consider marriage status, a societal social construct created only by patriarchy, by higher masculinity, the creator of culture. There is a world of political difference between a postmodern beta man who does not acknowledge his instincts and thus does not trust or use for himself his own potential, and an alpha patriarch who sublimates his instincts and trusts in his personal development and individual agency.

Institutional freedom from on high is worth less than nothing. Jeopardy of the individual is the mother of virtue and vice. Morality is not found in the win-lose relationship; advantage, perhaps.


The Prophet Mohammad was an illiterate Bedouin born into the Quraysh (or Koraysh) tribe. Unlike the other Bedouin tribes of Arabia, this one had control of a lucrative marketplace. Mecca then was the place of an oasis and the Kaaba shrine, a cubic stone building housing numerous idols representing the gods of the surrounding Bedouin tribes. The annual pilgrimage to the Kaaba occasioned a lucrative marketplace. Trade of some sort would also pass through Mecca because of the desert well. There were slaves, but that fact does not make clear what the difference was between rich and poor. Whatever the case, the harsh desert environment no doubt created a tough people not unaccustomed to contesting for limited resources.

Mohammad is billed as the great seal of the prophets. His prophecy is regarded by Muslims as the final and perfect correction of Abrahamic religion. Mohammad, we are told, was taught by the Angel Gabriel to repeat the exact words of Allah, the one true God who revealed Himself to Abraham. Those words, necessarily Arabic, were transcribed into the Quran. Hearing the words of the Quran recited is said to move men to ecstasy.

Islam literally means submission, as in total submission. Muslims pray five times every day, and nothing is regarded as secular or unregulated. In the Quran, Muslims are instructed to ‘smite’ the necks of infidels and repeatedly warned that unbelievers go to hell. Translations of the Quran have become easily accessible, now seen by many leading Muslims as a way to attract more followers. It would appear to be an adaptation to the culture war theatre created by the money-defining global elites.

Translating the Quran into another language could still get a person killed, as might apostasy. Ever take a gander at the Saudi flag? Muslims divide the world into the House of Peace and the House of War. Islam is branded as ‘The Religion of Peace’. Me thinks doth protest too much. The mission of Islam is crystal clear: total submission.

Quran 65:1–4 specifies that a man may not divorce his wife until she gives birth if she is found to be pregnant or until a period of three months has passed otherwise, even if the wife in question has never menstruated. The corpus of Islam starts with the Quran, but secondarily includes the words and deeds of Mohammad, known as Hadith or Sunnah. Fatwas issued by Islamic scholars round out the corpus. Osama bin Laden issued a few fatwas. In one he decried the inflation of the Saudi currency the Riyal.

A major Hadith collection of Sunni Muslims is the Sunan Abu-Dawud. Book 38, Hadith number 4449 therein may be translated:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offense can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.

The very next Hadith of the same collection, number 4450, may be translated:

There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.

To the scholar’s credit, the two Hadith are put together in the collection for convenient juxtaposition.

The Golden Age of Islam was fed on the cannibalism of classical antiquity and concurrent with the Middle Ages of the West. The Muslim conquest was thorough in its destruction of rival culture, largely in terms of architecture and knowledge. Even secular knowledge practically meaning Greek Rationalism was attacked. Scholars for our global masters tell us how Islam transmitted, through the distortion of translation to and from Arabic, most of the writings we have of the first great Western civilization. What Muslims truly did was destroy most of Western patrimony (further clarified just infra), and [Retracted, 01 June 2015. Supporting assertions were retracted 16 May 2015.] o[O]ur Western intelligentsia indoctrinates us to be thankful for our scraps of wisdom furnished by such noble rivals.

Muslim shrine Dome of the Rock was built on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. The original Second Temple and the replacement temple by the directive of Harod the Great were built after the Jewish exodus, but Harod’s Temple was razed by the Romans in 70 AD, and no temple was there when conquering Muslims decided to build their shrine. They found on the Temple Mount a garbage dump, consistent with what Jesus said according to Matthew 24:2. Great Mosque of Córdoba replaced a Christian church where a Roman temple of Janus had been. Some places are better for influential architecture than others.

[Update, 16 May 2015: I think the next paragraph about the Muslim destruction of infidel books is wrong. Evidence for an Islamic policy of book burning is completely lacking. There should be numerous well-documented examples, and there are not. The existence of the library in Alexandria, rather than its ruins, is suspect, and the library at Nalanda makes two libraries over territory from the Persian Gulf to the Atlantic Ocean. It is hardly anything. There is no reason libraries should somehow be immune from destruction more than other buildings.]

Great learning was destroyed by the Muslim conquest. In my opinion, that is a terrible shame and a huge slight against higher masculinity. Most famously, the Muslims burned the great library at Alexandria, Egypt in 642. Technocrats of the NWO falsely assert the library was not methodically destroyed by Muslims. [Again, this paragraph is retracted.]

I point out, as inoculum to Negroid race baiting, that the original Egyptians were tanned Caucasians and the Muslim Egyptians that have replaced them are Arabs, a swarthy Semitic people who are also Caucasian, with whatever admixture in no small part from past slave importation. Black Americans are also roughly one-fifth European white. Al Sharpton & Co. falsely claim Egyptian heritage as their own, and won’t touch white American heritage with a ten-foot pole. Hint: Wear pants that fit and speak fucking English.

Under the title “Sunday History Lecture: The Growth of Islam,” Aurini posted a great video of a talk by researcher Dr. Bill Warner. He details the destruction of Western patrimony extremely well. Roman civilization was quite alive and well just before the Muslim horde ransacked the cradle of Western civilization. The Byzantine Empire was controlling three-fourths of the Mediterranean coastline.

There are those who are caretakers of knowledge, and there is everybody else.

Destruction of giant mountainside Buddha carving:

There are those who totally submit to Islam and want a world caliphate, and there is everybody else.

Promotional video by Hizb ut-Tahrir America:

Of course, we still have the elites of the NWO and everybody else.

The vapidity and societal cluelessness of women is being cultivated in the West to destroy Western civilization. A case in point is white 54-year-old woman from Britain named Gillian Gibbons. In 2007 she was in Sudan teaching 7-year-olds about bears. Her students named a teddy bear Mohammad. Every tenth Muslim in the world is named Mohammad, yet for allowing children to name a teddy bear Mohammad she was arrested and jailed. Hundred of black Muslims protested to secure her execution, but she was eventually released unscathed. She was just there to make a difference, for da chilldrennzzzzzzz.

Nothing, but nothing, could illustrate female vapidity about societal relationships than the rape-assault on 11 February 2011 of seasoned Middle-East correspondent Lara Logan, a 39-year-old white South African. For twenty-five minutes, she was beaten by flag poles and fists, had her scalped pulled, was penetrated down there, The account in her own words is most telling:

And I’m screaming thinking if I scream, everything…they know they’re going to stop, you know someone’s going to stop them, or they’re going to stop themselves because this is wrong, and it was the opposite. It was the more I screamed it turned them into animals…it turned them into a frenzy.

You may see the interview from 60 Minutes at or find a lower quality copy on youtube. At the start of the interview, she is smiling, beaming, from recalling the celebrations at Tahrir Square before her assault. Ah, the Arab Spring, 2011. Now the liberated Muslims will shine at the vanguard of humanity. They just need some fodder, but I could say the same thing about Jewry.

Islam is generally interpreted to allow female circumcision. The most authoritative Islamic law on the subject seems to be weak Hadiths of dubious authenticity supporting it, but in limited fashion due to other Islamic law regarding individual welfare. In practice, by whomever, female circumcision usually involves cutting of the clitoris at a minimum. Maybe suspecting the penis and the clitoris develop from the same bud, which they do, is too daunting. Similarly, the labia and scrotum have a common gestational progenitor. Some men find uncircumcised women unsuitable for marriage. The logic appears to be that a woman unable or less able to enjoy sex is a better wife.

In places where survival can’t be taken as granted, I can see the practicality. (Nevertheless, I find the practice abhorrent. I dislike even male circumcision.) Feminism is not viable where survival is not a common luxury. Islam is the religion, politics, and culture of Bedouins, not metrosexual Western male feminists and their excessively free female cohorts.


I commented on an article at Return of Kings by Athlone McGinnis entitled “Why Famous Men Become Outspoken Feminists.” Joaquin De Magdalena, as self-identified, made a reply to my comment:

“Goes back to debt slavery as codified 3 thousand years ago the books of (a supposed) Moses”

Name specifically which book, chapter and line in the old testament written by Moses where debt slavery is codified, before you pass on lies and slander the Bible before everyone here.

Sir, you have my answer.

Amazingly, Noah fit two animals of every land species harmoniously into a wooden boat. Amazingly, Moses is considered the single author of the Torah, sometimes including the commentary on his death and mourning period of 30 days. Amazingly, the god of Moses, a god better than the rival Hebrew gods, matures to be the only God ever, to be Alpha and Omega (Revelation 1:8). Amazingly, the Abrahamic religions distinguish themselves from the pagan religions, yet they embrace as righteous the call to their patriarch Abraham to sacrifice his son, and Abraham’s willingness to comply. What’s a little, tiny nod to child sacrifice among believers who aren’t filthy pagans?

Amazingly, having a central bank is the 5th of 10 planks in The Communist Manifesto (1848) by Karl Marx, amazingly of Jewish ethnicity (they do select for intelligence, unlike say…), and by Friedrich Engels, son of a rich English industrialist who funded Marx’s writing pursuits. Amazingly, in that same year was inaugurated the American woman’s suffrage movement by a 300-person convention—all men asked to remain silent during its proceedings—producing along with over one hundred signatories the Declaration of Rights and Sentiments (1848):

He [man, meaning men generally] has usurped the prerogative of Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of action, when that belongs to her conscience and her God.

Cherchez la femme. Beware your liberated mothers of Esau.

—‘Reality’ Doug, 22 January 2014


About ‘Reality’ Doug

I'm feed up with herd people, so civil and uncivilized, these feckless barbarians with manicures. Where is Galt's Gulch? and where are the people to go there? Who am I? Who is John Galt?
Gallery | This entry was posted in Philosophy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s