As I have said, and I’m saying it again: women judge on relative social status and use covert means (female packism); most black men, overt means with primitive culture (tribalism). Getting past the women and the savages of whatever color we get to barbarism and civilizationalism each mostly of both yellows and whites. Civilized men are absolutist systemizers, though I don’t recommend building anything other than a flexible, opportunistic, disposable power structure to serve and protect the ones who matter starting with yourself.
The exclusion of property rights as part of the new civil rights has destroyed the system of civilized absolutists. Leave it to ejuwmicated woymnz to splain why that’s a good thing:
There are some serious economic advantages for marrying later, including greater economic prosperity for women. Another reason may be the desire to avoid one’s parents’ mistakes: “The fact that a lot of these kids are children of divorce makes them cautious, it makes them scared, it makes them gun-shy,” Linda Waite, a professor of sociology at the University of Chicago, told ABC News.
Tell your family members to put that in their pipe and smoke it. If endless questions about why you’re not seeing anyone have you down, don’t worry. Keep on engaging in that mindless, casual sex, because it’s probably good for you anyway.
And if you’re still worried about being single, don’t stress. It’s not you — it’s everyone.
Don’t get sucked into the logic of it. Notice what that says of her relative status and her readers’. You didn’t fail, you avoided the mistakes your parent’s made. Hint: you could do both. And the endless questions suggest as much. If a woman is a failed piece of meat, she has failed. Because women are relativists, they argue that if everyone fails, no one fails. That is proof women are not cultural, that women at large have no business steering society. We can all live like animals together. That is the natural environment of women, and they can only move us in that direction.
You might be tempted to argue with a woman who has a big logical edifice of bullshit such as the above. I suggest you not invest at the logical level with such a specimen. She is not a civilized man. If you like, trigger emotional and instinctive attraction or motivation to suit your needs. You might go along to get along in the reasoning-to-reasoning communication, but be brief and forget about intellectual integrity. Prove her emotional integrity is not threatened by you, you steward of women’s emotional needs, you. You could disagree, state your principle or some thought in a sentence or two, not budge, and not care that you don’t fit her expectations. Does she have enough self-esteem (SMV) to desire a challenge from a suitor for casual like the animals sex? In any event, don’t take the logical edifice of the hamster at face value. That would be like putting a child in a driver’s seat and expecting, even encouraging, responsible driving. Don’t encourage her to make a mess.
Treat a sophisticated feral animal like the creature that it is. She wants social cred the way animals see it, so dispense it or not as it pleases your interests as much as the animal kingdom can satisfy it, but move on to no interaction or to interaction of escalation to lizard brain communication for sex with minimized legal risk. Momentary partial flashes of the O-face during an ‘adult’ conversation makes for an interesting social experiment in a coffee shop. If you care about a woman’s opinion like you would your own or a civilized being’s, you have already lost. Words are just a tool to women. They will never play on your field of intellectual honesty except by opportunistic coincidence. Correlation is not causality. She will delay her relational responses to disguise her designs. Body language is the language of women and savages, and the civilized man must learn it.
First, ignore the bullshit.
—‘Reality’ Doug, 10 September 2014