There is no one-and-done red pill like in the movie, boyz. The latest salient example comes from a very good article with lots of good points: “The Deregulation Of The Sexual Marketplace” by Mad Max, dated 29 November 2014.
Deregulation = No Regulation
Slavery by one’s own nature is not really slavery: that’s domestication value. Women are not liberated, they are elevated beyond their worth by fiat money. This is social engineering, always concomitant with economic debt slavery. Women have two kinds of instincts: (1) survival, and (2) reproduction. That is basic Mystery from the beginning. What we have is the givernmont guarantee that men will die trying to produce before women’s survival needs and even material comforts will cease to be transferred one way or another from rank-and-file men. It could be a welfare check, an undeserved job that shouldn’t even exist (National Fucktard League has a VP of Social Responsibility since September 15th, 2014—following a communiqué from Ray Rice to his financeé that she undoubtedly could understand BEFORE following through with the marriage), child-hostage-to-the-cultureless-parent support, no-sex-again support, etc.
Women would never ever be able to behave the way they have been, that is to say adapt, unless they could use psychological violence, and increasingly the man’s natural forte physical violence. Western men who desire not taking the law into their own hands do not deserve well-ordered families. Women are simply taking what they can WELL BEYOND liberation. It is animal virtue, like crabs in a bucket. Women have always been liberated from men but never themselves: women would rather live elevated and more competitive lives in wealth possible only by culturally cooperative producer men than to live like animals, but if you let them have their cakes and eat them too…
Women lack moral agency. I don’t want to digress into what morality is and is not. I already wrote about it long ago, and it was not well received. I argue this: Morality does not occur unless men require it. Might makes right, and win-win cooperation is the most mighty strategy on earth if and only if it is really win-win cooperation.
It is up to men to at least positively reward only the female conduct that is net positive.
Is that not the point of both PUA and MGTOW? Charity for destruction is destruction.
Mother nature will force women to be a net positive to society if you men would stop subsidizing them, both materially and emotionally. Sick to the bare legal minimum! Women are no more or less
liberated divorced from their own natures than in the past. They are unusually coddled, as always happens at the end of civilization when the economy is a political hostage of bureaucratic armies wielding the power of institutional authority. Regular men of disenfranchisement, of compliance, are unworthy of enough respect for commitment.
The whole idea of MGTOW is pulling the plug that let’s women suppose that they are ‘liberated’ and actually earning what they have. They are not. You are giving it to them. You are giving them too much credit. Women will be great wives when not doing so means poverty and starvation, as is the natural state of vapid show animals, for them and their bastard spawn.
No, a man does not owe a woman child support even for his own child under these perverse circumstances: the abortive feature is the survival-guaranteed woman as middleman. Doesn’t she control her own body? And lie? Didn’t she then make the executive decision? There is no fucking way in hell a woman as an equal or superior co-parent is feasible for the civilized man. Animal parenting is far less of an expense than cultural parenting. Animal parenting is insufficient to make pillars of economy and society. Cultural parenting is a privilege women must deserve by honoring and obeying the husband. There is no sense in failing yourself and helping a vicious animal succeed in using you.
Animal parenting is woman’s work.
No way a civilized man should take on the responsibility of passing on culture to the next generation only to fail by the mother’s government-prescribed sabotage, to exhaust himself for nothing, and to loose all credibility in the eyes of his children who will never consult him on the facts of life when they are on the cusp of adulthood. If women want the ‘freedom’ of animal reproduction, let them reap what they sow!
You are not in the wild. You are on a tax farm. Women have empowering benefits far beyond the base state of natural deregulation. Remember than producer men evolved to create culture and make alpha wild men obsolete. That was a truly deregulated environment! In a deregulated environment, surviving betas are not such willing suckers.
The achievements of humanity are nearly exactly the achievements of natural producer men, betas. Adaptation to the decline is not adaptation to life in general: society is not fit to go on under this political regimen, so it is dying.
I am asking you to have the emotional guts to take credit for yourself, for what’s yours by the natural right of your personal vitality. Stop giving credit to women when you and I are the ones propping them up by force of givernmont guns. You think women are able careerists all by themselves? Pleeeeeezzzee. Giving women credit they don’t deserve is the psychological aspect of men like you being a debt slave and women like them being ‘better’ than you. That occurs not because they get very high but because you go very low. Your vocabulary should be your frame of support, not your prison. Emotional detachment from the constructs of your bondage is seen only by philosophy, my friend.
Women are not liberated. Women are subsidized, domesticated by interloper husband your gubbermint.
Men are regulated down; women up; the sexes apart.
To free your mind, you must think with precision and reform away the inconsistencies. The treatment of blue pill psychosis is a process, a lifestyle. Are you worth it?
Unplug. Side step. Ride. Rebuild. PUA is the way.
—‘Reality’ Doug, 29 November 2014