Château Heartiste posted “Porn Lowers Men’s Real Life Standards,” dated 28 August 2017. Love the blog, but this sperge is buying neither the thesis of the feminists nor the antithesis of CH. CH himself allows for both to be right; keyword: ‘Hormesis’. Me thinks duplicity is flawed theory.
The feminists/women, we are told, argue that men raise their expectations unrealistically, but bitches be bitches. They tear down men to relatively build themselves up. What’s new? Her subsidized instincts are explanation o’plenty. The truth of porn’s impact on the sexual marketplace, or the economy, whatever, means nothing to women because more is never enough. I doubt everything would be enough. The destruction of the West is pretty much everything my life might have been.
CH argues that men work less for real life sex and lower their WB standards. Thus, porn makes men more pliant for women. Vinegar may say it tastes good, but damn, girlfriend. There isn’t enough makeup in the world to make 90 percent of Western women decent company. Going without is less pain, and porn’s got nothing to do with it.
Porn is neither a substitute for sex nor a complement to it, and it is both. It’s porn, a tool of entertainment at the nexus of several profound dimensions of the human condition. Anyone addicted to porn in the world of unavailable pussy could just as easily be addicted to sex in the world of plentiful pussy, whether it be solely from a wife or from a stream of stranger honeypots. Productively able men who are denied their birthright of purpose and identity by oppressive institutional rule, as opposed to the law of culture administered by patriarchy, who are forced to facilitate their abuse and isolation as cogs and scapegoats, who are forced to go without their basic needs met, are going to find some outlet for their stress, anxiety, and time on this earth. Escapism is a coping mechanism. Eating excess calories is a coping mechanism. Whacking off is a coping mechanism. Video games and porn are useful tools for coping with hostile opportunity costs that can’t be avoided.
Why would porn be so bad and yet so popular? Is freedom itself bad? We can subjugate our way to prosperity so long as the parasites have priority? Bullshit! I’m a libertarian, one who also believes in conquest and patriarchy. Patriarchs ought to be libertarians with their brothers, win-win political and economic cooperation, which ends the clarifying digression. Porn doesn’t kill people; people kill people. Personally, I am grateful that the beauty of the female form and function is something I have seen because of porn. It’s not all artful poetry, of course. Life is like that too. Don’t be a pussy about pussy or anything else.
So my proposition is that porn is not ruining people or society. Those who can’t use porn responsibly will get weeded out. It that not a service? Stop trying to save human garbage. What a burden that is on posterity, and we are essentially the posterity and legacy of the fucking baby boomers. There are plenty of forces handily destroying society and the people locked into it, from the printing and digital presses to female prerogative to white knights of self-emasculation. Without the practice of philosophy, as in citizen sovereigns with common sense and the law in their hands, there is no solution. Civilization is a human group effort at social engineering with transparency and force called culture. Conquest like evolution never sleeps. Better to have full cooperation with yourself than autonomic bonds with a herd of animals.
God is not the answer, or the Middle Ages would not have been in the middle of nowhere. Funny that I found a post entitled “Christianity: A Virus of the Mind,” dated 22 August 2017 and by Jack Ronin of The Savage Lifestyle, from the Hawaiian Libertarian’s blog feed. It’s all and always about control. The game is sovereignty. Everything else is masturbation of one kind or another. Real masturbation is just more honest and self empowering.
—‘Reality’ Doug, 29 August 2017
